A New York Magistrate dismissed the top count of second-degree manslaughter against Daniel Penny, Jordan Neely’s killer. The trial “judge” acting as a jury of Daniel Penny’s peers has tipped the scales of justice in favor of his client.
It is unknown if the so-called judge is a relative of Roy and Carolyn Bryant. Some members of the twelve-member jury needed help following instructions or comprehending what was read to them. They did not understand what a “reasonable” person means. “REASONABLE Person” is one of the most precise definitions in law.
There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in public restrooms or restrooms on the job. If your boss videotapes you using the restroom, the company acted unreasonably. Such a company could be sanctioned according to law. BCT is on the verge of violating the law of reasonable expectation of privacy.
If someone drinks forty bottles of 64oz of Vodka at one setting, then gets in his car and drives 100 MPH down the street and kills someone — is the action of the drunkard reasonable? No! Lock his ass up. Such a person’s behavior is reckless and negligent.
If you hang someone by the neck for six minutes, would a “reasonable” person expect the hanged person to survive? While you are hanging someone by the neck, if the hanging person starts flailing and defecating on themself, as a reasonable person — would you conclude the hanging person is dying? Daniel Penny has a lush face. Many police larpers are drunkards. Did Daniel Penny fail the Psych test and get turned down by the N.Y.P.D.?
Don’t be fooled by the skewed gibberish coming from the mouths of the reporters with Nazis leanings on Fox News and News-Flation. There has never been the murder of an African American that those bigots never celebrate.
